Table 1
|
Course/ Quarter offered |
Technical base |
Number of students |
Online enhancements |
||
|
Trad |
Online |
Both |
|||
|
Anthropology Winter 2000/02 |
MOBY1 |
1902 |
1853 |
n/a |
Synchronous discussion group & quizzes |
|
Food Science Fall 2000 |
MOBY1 |
242 |
65 |
56 |
|
|
Art History Fall 2001 |
MOBY1 |
67 |
16 |
9 |
|
|
Statistics Fall 2001 |
Cyber-Stats4 |
198 |
74 |
n/a |
Interactive applications, practice problems, self-assessment tests |
|
Psychology Fall 2001 |
WebCT5 |
36 |
18 |
24 |
Chat room |
|
Viticulture & Enology Fall 2001 |
MOBY1 |
204 |
33 |
20 |
|
1 In-house course management system
2 Winter 2000
3 Winter 2002
4 Electronic textbook (http://statistics.cyberk.com/splash/)
5 Commercially-available course management system (http://www.webct.com/)
Table 2
Student Performance (Standard Scores, Mean = 50, SD = 10) by Usage Group for Each Course, Controlling for GPA and Class Standing
Mean performance Standard Error Sample size
|
Course |
Trad |
Online |
Both |
|
Trad |
Online |
Both |
|
Trad |
Online |
Both |
|
Anthropology |
51.80 |
48.16 |
|
|
0.77 |
0.78 |
|
|
190 |
185 |
|
|
Food Science |
51.26 |
49.15 |
48.60 |
|
0.48 |
0.93 |
1.01 |
|
242 |
65 |
56 |
|
Art History |
51.04 |
48.77 |
44.46 |
|
0.87 |
1.85 |
2.50 |
|
67 |
16 |
9 |
|
Statistics |
50.27 |
49.49 |
|
|
0.60 |
0.99 |
|
|
198 |
74 |
|
|
Psychology |
50.31 |
49.20 |
50.96 |
|
1.34 |
0.95 |
1.16 |
|
18 |
36 |
24 |
|
Viticulture & Enology |
50.06 |
50.34 |
47.52 |
|
0.54 |
1.33 |
1.72 |
|
204 |
33 |
20 |
Table 3
Significance
test and strength of effect (Eta-Squared) for Traditional and Online Groups, by
Course (Standard Scores, Mean = 50, SD = 10)
|
Course |
Mean Difference (traditional Ð online) |
SEdiff |
p(1-tail) |
z-value of p |
h2 |
|
Anthropology |
3.64 |
1.25 |
.002 |
2.88 |
.014 |
|
Food Science |
2.11 |
1.06 |
.024 |
1.98 |
.013 |
|
Art History |
2.26 |
2.05 |
.136 |
1.10 |
.022 |
|
Statistics |
0.78 |
1.16 |
.250 |
0.67 |
.002 |
|
Psychology |
1.11 |
1.65 |
.252 |
0.67 |
.013 |
|
Viticulture & Enology |
-0.28 |
1.44 |
.424 |
-0.29 |
.000 |
Figure 1. ÒThis
was a good course.Ó Means and .95 confidence intervals for student ratings
(5 = Strongly Agree, 1 = Strongly disagree) by usage group for each
course.

Figure 2.
ÒOverall, the instructor is a good teacher.Ó Means and .95 confidence
intervals for student ratings (5 = Strongly Agree, 1 = Strongly disagree)
by usage group for each course.